1) Sure, the test did evaluate the knowledge I had. Very poorly thought out though on the part of whoever wrote it. Correct answers are sometimes marked incorrect anyways. Better HTML knowledge and a bit of refreshing on how scripts work would help.
2)One too many to list. Theoretically, nearly all of my answers should have been correct, but some were simply marked wrong for being right. Feel free to tell me otherwise.
3)Paperless. That is all.
4) Room for error during test creation, i.e. bad scripts.
5)A simple test on paper would do far better. A human is far more efficient at processing test results. The EMACS Doctor would do a better job.
6)No. That is all.
7)No. They're usually poorly made.
Again, this is a terrible test.
No comments:
Post a Comment